21 ответов в этой теме

[C.S.J]

What is the correct methodology?

the correct methodology of what aspect?

ARA the thread subject - take a look at shadowserver.org, the 0day daily statistics is here

yes, but it is the only one at the moment who test drweb on a regular basis, and im SURE their tests are flawed aswell.

[skokospa]

Hello
I was waiting more arguments and concretions before i logged in.

BL

June 2008 - Doctor Web Dr.Web Status: FAIL Failure reason: 16 wildlist misses, 3 false positives http:///virusbulletin/archive/2008/06/vb200806-comparative Doctor Web Dr.Web on Ubuntu Linux Server Edition
April 2008 - Doctor Web Dr.Web Status: FAIL Failure reason: 47 wildlist misses http:///virusbulletin/archive/2008/04/vb200804-comparative Doctor Web Dr.Web on Windows Vista SP1 Business Edition
February 2008 - Doctor Web Dr. Web Antivirus for Windows Server Failure reason: 4 wildlist misses Product name: Doctor Web Dr. Web Antivirus for Windows Server 2003
December 2007 - Doctor Web Dr. Web Status FAIL Failure reason: 11 wildlist misses, 2 false positives http:///virusbulletin/archive/2007/12/vb200712-comparative Doctor Web Dr. Web on Windows 2000
has poor tests
The point is that from April 2007g. Dr.Web has not passed any test ....
and another "independent" test laboratory .......http://www.virus.gr/portal/en/content/2009-08%2C-10-august-05-september
of 2008g. Dr.Web not participate in tests of VB ...
why?
as I am aware it is one of the most .... a lot of organizations together to participate ....
think version 5 should return for testing and ate a good show or not ....
As Mr.Igor Daniloff said "the purpose of antivirus software that protect you from viruses"
and the trunk is right ....
I think that should we do less tests and more .... for example the current Dr.Web GUI reminds me of Windows 95